今日の問題へきょうの問題もんだいへ

2026年10月16日(金)の要約問題2026年10月16日(金)の問題もんだい

この日に出題した問題の原文、要約に含めるべき要点、模範要約です。自分の要約と比べて、要点の漏れや言い換えの不足を確認してください。同じ問題でAI添削を受けることもできます。この日ひの問題もんだいと、お手本てほんだよ。

2級要約 45〜55語45〜55語ご原文 169語元もとの文ぶん 169語ご
Volunteers Help Repair Cafés
原文元もとの文ぶん

Recently, repair cafés have become popular in some towns. At these events, volunteers help people fix broken household items instead of throwing them away. The volunteers may have skills in sewing, electronics, or woodworking, while visitors bring items that need attention. This is a new kind of volunteer activity that combines helping neighbors with reducing waste.

One benefit is that people can save money because they do not need to buy new items as often. They can also learn simple repair skills by watching volunteers, so they may feel more confident fixing things at home. In addition, keeping useful items out of the trash can reduce waste and help protect the environment.

However, there are some concerns. Volunteers may not have the right tools or enough experience to repair every item safely, especially electrical devices. Also, these events depend on people giving their time, so they may not happen regularly if too few volunteers join. Organizers need to check safety carefully and find ways to keep volunteers interested.

要約に含めるべき要点要約ようやくに入いれるポイント

  1. Repair cafés are a growing form of volunteering that helps people mend items and reduce waste.
  2. They help people save money, learn repair skills, and keep usable goods out of the trash.
  3. Safety limits and a shortage of volunteers can make these events difficult to maintain.

模範要約(52語)お手本てほん(52語ご)

Repair cafés are a growing type of community service where volunteers help residents fix belongings rather than discard them. This can lower household costs, teach practical abilities, and reduce the amount of waste. However, limited expertise may create safety risks, and a lack of helpers can prevent the events from continuing.

模範要約は一例です。同じ要点を含み、語数範囲に収まっていれば、別の言い換えでも高く評価されます。お手本てほんとちがう言いい方かたでも、ポイントが入はいっていればいいよ。

この問題でAI添削を受けるこの問題もんだいをやってみる
準1級要約 60〜70語60〜70語ご原文 245語元もとの文ぶん 245語ご
Tourism Pollution and the Cost of Convenience
原文元もとの文ぶん

In recent years, popular destinations have begun using digital tools to manage the growing number of visitors. Travelers can reserve time slots, follow suggested routes, and receive live updates about crowded areas. These systems are often presented as a way to make tourism more sustainable. Yet they may also encourage a new pattern: visitors spread across a wider area, reaching neighborhoods that previously experienced little tourist activity. This shift raises questions about whether pollution can be reduced or simply moved elsewhere.

One benefit is that visitor-management technology can help cities use their infrastructure more efficiently. By directing people away from crowded sites and adjusting transport schedules to match demand, authorities may reduce traffic jams, noise, and pressure on public services at peak times. Local businesses can also gain customers in less-visited districts, which may make tourism income more widely shared and strengthen support for protecting cultural sites.

However, there are concerns that distributing visitors does not necessarily reduce their total environmental impact. Longer journeys between attractions can increase emissions, while new demand may lead to construction that damages local ecosystems. Residents may also face rising rents and a loss of privacy as formerly quiet streets become popular online. In addition, reliance on digital systems can disadvantage people without reliable internet access and create detailed records of travelers’ movements. For these measures to be genuinely sustainable, destinations must consider not only where tourists go, but also how many travel and who bears the costs.

要約に含めるべき要点要約ようやくに入いれるポイント

  1. Digital visitor-management tools are changing where tourists travel, raising the question of whether pollution is reduced or relocated.
  2. Managing visitor flows can ease pressure on infrastructure and spread tourism income to less-visited areas.
  3. Dispersing tourists may increase emissions and harm ecosystems, residents, and people affected by digital exclusion or tracking.

模範要約(61語)お手本てほん(61語ご)

Digital systems are reshaping tourist routes, but their ability to lessen pollution is uncertain because they may shift activity to new locations. Better visitor distribution can reduce congestion and pressure on services while sharing economic gains more broadly. However, extra travel and development may damage the environment, while communities could experience higher costs, reduced privacy, and unequal access to the technology.

模範要約は一例です。同じ要点を含み、語数範囲に収まっていれば、別の言い換えでも高く評価されます。お手本てほんとちがう言いい方かたでも、ポイントが入はいっていればいいよ。

この問題でAI添削を受けるこの問題もんだいをやってみる
1級要約 90〜110語90〜110語ご原文 91語元もとの文ぶん 91語ご
Freedom of Speech in the Age of Synthetic Media
原文元もとの文ぶん

Freedom of speech has long been understood as a safeguard against government censorship, but the debate is shifting as artificial intelligence makes it possible to fabricate convincing audio and video. In many countries, platforms are introducing labels, verification systems, and rules governing political content, while lawmakers consider whether existing protections can address speech that is amplified or altered by automated tools. The issue is no longer only who may speak; it is also how audiences can distinguish genuine expression from manufactured persuasion without allowing authorities or companies to control public debate.

要約に含めるべき要点要約ようやくに入いれるポイント

  1. Synthetic media has expanded the debate about how freedom of speech should be protected online.
  2. Clear rules and reliable information can help people assess claims and preserve open discussion.
  3. Content controls may enable censorship, deepen distrust, or unfairly restrict less powerful speakers.

模範要約(80語)お手本てほん(80語ご)

Artificial intelligence has complicated the traditional understanding of free expression by making deceptive media more convincing, prompting platforms and governments to reconsider how online speech is regulated. Thoughtful standards and transparent labeling could help audiences evaluate information, strengthen trust in public discussion, and protect individuals from fabricated claims without suppressing legitimate criticism. Yet moderation systems can be manipulated or applied inconsistently, and broad restrictions may empower institutions to silence dissent, intensify public suspicion, and disadvantage speakers with limited influence. (91 words)

模範要約は一例です。同じ要点を含み、語数範囲に収まっていれば、別の言い換えでも高く評価されます。お手本てほんとちがう言いい方かたでも、ポイントが入はいっていればいいよ。

この問題でAI添削を受けるこの問題もんだいをやってみる

関連する解説記事もっと知しりたい人へ

解説記事の一覧を見る記事きじをぜんぶ見る